DoD Admits US Global Hegemony Threatened By China, Russia In “Persistently Disordered World”

From Zero Hedge:

By 2035, the US could find itself in an environment where Russia or China may match or even exceed the West’s military and economic might in some areas, taking advantage of a “disordered and contested world,” the Pentagon’s research unit said…

Conflict and war in 2035 cannot be understood by the simple identification of a set of individual trends and conditions. Instead, the intersection and interaction of many discrete trends and conditions will ultimately change the character of future conflict and illuminate the reasons why the Joint Force may be called on to address threats to U.S. national interests. In fact, conflict in 2035 is likely to be driven by six specific and unique combinations of trends and conditions.

 

Each of these Contexts of Future Conflict creates a troubling problem space for the Joint Force. They include:

 

1. Violent Ideological Competition. Irreconcilable ideas communicated and promoted by identity networks through violence.

 

2. Threatened U.S. Territory and Sovereignty. Encroachment, erosion, or disregard of U.S. sovereignty and the freedom of its citizens from coercion.

 

3. Antagonistic Geopolitical Balancing. Increasingly ambitious adversaries maximizing their own influence while actively limiting U.S. influence.

 

4. Disrupted Global Commons. Denial or compulsion in spaces and places available to all but owned by none.

 

5. A Contest for Cyberspace. A struggle to define and credibly protect sovereignty in cyberspace.

 

6. Shattered and Reordered Regions. States unable to cope with internal political fractures, environmental stressors, or deliberate external interference.

 

Each context includes elements of both contested norms and persistent disorder. However, their relative importance will vary depending on the objectives of potential adversaries and the capabilities available to them. Dissatisfaction with the current set of international rules, norms, and agreements will cause revisionist actors to make their own – and attempt to enforce them. …

Continue Reading