Major U.S. Poultry Producer Embraces Use of Antibiotics despite Potential Health Threat

From AllGov:


By Stephanie Strom, New York Times


In the last couple of years, the poultry industry has sharply reduced its use of antibiotics, responding to concerns among public health officials and regulators about the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.


But now, one major poultry processor is standing its ground.


Sanderson Farms, the country’s third-largest poultry producer, has started an advertising campaign to defend its continued use of antibiotics — and calls its competitors’ efforts in the other direction a “marketing gimmick” aimed at charging higher prices.


“There’s a lot of confusion about the labels used to market chicken,” said Mike Cockrell, chief financial officer at Sanderson. “We have decided we’re not going to sacrifice our environmental goals, our animal welfare goals or our food safety goals for marketing purposes.”


The ads feature two blue-collar men, Bob and Dale, in plaid shirts and baseball caps talking about the labels on chicken.


“The ones that say ‘raised without antibiotics,’” Dale says in one of the ads, “That’s just a trick to get you to pay more money.”


Sanderson’s marketing campaign is likely to intensify the already fierce fight over the use of antibiotics in agriculture. Consumers, advocacy groups and corporate customers like McDonald’s and Chick-fil-A have said they will buy only chicken raised without the antibiotics used to treat humans.


Those commitments and others have persuaded four of the five large U.S. poultry producers to begin reducing their reliance on antibiotics.


But not Sanderson.


“There is not any credible science that leads us to believe we’re causing antibiotic resistance in humans,” said Lampkin Butts, president and chief operating officer of Sanderson.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has repeatedly expressed concern that the use of antibiotics …

Continue Reading